National Security vs. Civil Liberties

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  ~Benjamin Franklin

 

 

 

 

             After the tragic attacks on America on September 11th, 2001, many have been left wondering how to best protect our country. The hurt and anguish felt by Americans after this incident led many to support a stance of swift, firm, action on the perpetrators. Our government immediately enacted legislation to help Americans remain safe. However, the question is still debatable about how safe we truly are. We believe that some national security policies are seriously violating individuals rights, and because of this, changes need to be made to ensure that America remains a safe, yet fair nation. Benjamin Franklin once wrote “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”  History has shown that when civil liberties are neglected for over-zealous national security measures, the dignity and respect of citizens’ rights are violated.


About the Authors

     

Mary Bridget Mathews is a native of Cleveland, Ohio. She is participating in this project for Dr. Fisanick’s Rhetoric English course. She has enjoyed researching this topic and is happy to share with you her opinion on the security issues facing this nation.

  Click here to visit Mary Bridget's literacy autobiography. 

  Andrew Howard Busch is from Indianapolis, Indiana and is a freshman at Xavier University where he is enrolled in Dr. Fisanick's rhetoric course. He feels like he has developed a greater understanding of the security issues are nation faces and is happy to share what he has learned. 

  Click here to visit Andrew's literacy autobiography.

 

To link to Rhetoric 115 homepage click here!

 

 

Next