HOME AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES EMBRYONIC DRAWBACKS RELIGIOUS OPPOSITION EMBRYONIC BENEFITS ANNOTATED LINKS
RELIGIOUS OPPOSITION
Christopher Gibson
 

      Stem cell research offers vast scientific potential, and it has given hope for a cure for many who suffer from presently incurable maladies. However, this issue is surrounded in controversy on all sides, as many people object to stem cell research for various reasons. Some say that stem cell research is merely a pawn used in political debates, while others claim that the research is necessary for the advancement of our country’s scientific prowess. Still others object to stem cell research, especially with embryonic stem cells, based on ethical opinions to which they adhere vehemently. The most well known opposition to embryonic stem cell research comes from Christians, with the Catholic Church being at the forefront of the opposition. Although I do not consider myself to be a very religious individual, I tend to side with my faith in opposing this type of research. I do this because I agree with the Catholic Church’s ethical position, which forbids the taking of any human life, even if it may potential help others in the future. I hope that this essay might serve to provide a brief background of the scientific aspects of embryonic stem cells and an overview of the Catholic Church’s ethical and moral opposition to the research.

     Nonetheless, before I can effectively discuss the underlying ethical issues of embryonic stem cells, it is necessary to give a brief overview of what stem cells are, how they can be obtained, and what treatments they have already made possible. According to the National Institute of Health, “stem cells are cells that have the remarkable potential to develop into many different cell types in the body.” [1] Stem cells can, under the right conditions, be used to grow new tissues or even a whole organ that can be used for transplant procedures. There are two main types of stem cells, each with a different source and a different amount of potential. Pluripotent stem cells are the ones that are taken from human embryos that are a few days old, and they can become any cell type other than those needed to originally grow the embryo; however, the process of obtaining the pluripotent stem cells destroys the embryo. Embryonic stem cells can sometimes also be isolated from blood from the spinal chord, but this process is more difficult. [2] The other type of stem cells, known as adult stem cells, are multipotent, which means that they can only develop into a number of different cell types. These cells are often obtained from adult human bone marrow (although there are other sources, such as fat tissues), and the process of extracting them does no permanent harm to the patient.

     It is a common misconception of many that we are on the verge of using the vast potential of embryonic stem cells to treat a number of deadly diseases. Although they offer more potential than adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells present a greater challenge for scientists, as they have the ability to multiply out of control and become cancerous if not handled properly.  [3] Furthermore, recent discoveries have shown that adult stem cells can be made to transform into more varied types of cells than previously thought possible, and consequently many treatments have already been developed that utilize these multipotent cells. The website of Do No Harm (The Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics), a group strongly opposed to embryonic stem cell research, lists fifty-six diseases that are currently treatable with adult stem cells, including Parkinson’s disease, Crohn’s disease, arthritis, and numerous types of cancer. Some of these diseases have already begun to be treated with adult stem cells. [4] Therefore, at least for the present, adult stem cells present a more readily available and safer method of treatment than their counterparts obtained from embryos.

      But all of this is just background information, details that must be known to understand the Catholic position against the destruction of embryos to obtain pluripotent stem cells. The Church objects to the use research of embryonic stem cells on the sole basis of how they must be obtained: through the destruction of a human embryo. Many of the supporters of embryonic stem cell research claim that this is no problem, as they do not regard an embryo as human life, since it cannot survive on its own. Thomas Shannon, a professor of religion and social ethics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and a contributor to the Catholic Update, claims that those who support the destruction of embryos to obtain stem cells justify this because, “while the [embryo] is a living organism, possessing the human genetic code, such an organism is indeed valuable, but its value is not yet that accorded to a person.” [5] Whether or not a few days old human embryo is a human being or not is a subject of great debate, and is the source of the disagreements on the controversial issue of embryonic stem cell research.

      Even strong opponents to embryonic stem cell research such as Shannon admit that, if it were true that an embryo is not tantamount to a fully human individual, he and no other members of the Church would object to using embryos for obtaining stem cells. However, it is the opinion of the Catholic Church, and that of other Christian denominations as well, that life begins at the moment of conception, and therefore an embryo is just as much a human being as are you and I. This view is established in the 1987 Church document Donum Vitae (“Gift of Life”), which states that the “human being is to be respected and treated as a person from the moment of conception and therefore from that same moment his rights as a person must be recognized” (I, 1). This issue also pertains to the “Culture of Life” philosophy espoused by Pope John Paul II, who rightfully claims that our modern culture is beginning to value the sanctity of life much less than we should. The eagerness of many to destroy embryos that he, I, and most members of the Catholic Church oppose is just one example of this phenomenon. However, there are many who are quick to point out that the embryos that can be used in research are those that would be discarded anyway by fertility clinics. Although this is a very good objection, the Church’s opinion is that the embryos in clinics should not be destroyed routinely to begin with. [6]

     Given the Catholic perspective on embryonic stem cell research, I believe it is interesting to note the opinions of other religions, which are almost unanimously in support of the research. Although Judaism is the religious root of Catholicism and all of Christianity, the official interpretation of the Jewish law allows for the destruction of embryos to obtain stem cells, as Judaism does not consider an embryo to be fully human until it has developed for forty days. A majority of Jews support embryonic stem cell research, because it entails providing medical aid for other human beings, even though it comes at the price of destroying not-quite-human embryos. [7] Similar opinions are found in the Muslim faith, which does not consider a developing human to be fully human or to have a soul until the 120th day after conception, and therefore destroying embryos for scientific research is ethically justified. [8] However, I still believe that the Catholic position is correct: due to the sanctity of all human life, beginning with conception and ending in death, innocent embryos may not be destroyed to obtain stem cells, regardless of the vast potential these cells may have in helping us find cures for terrible diseases and advance our scientific knowledge.

 References

1. National Institute of Health. “Stem Cell Information.” 4 Nov. 2004. 15 Nov. 2004. <http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/faqs.asp>.

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Do No Harm: The Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics. 14 Nov. 2004 <http://www.stemcellresearch.org/>.

5. Shannon, Thomas A. "Stem-Cell Research: How Catholic Ethics Guide Us." Catholic Update. 2002. 14 Nov. 2004 <http://www.americancatholic.org/Newsletters/CU/ac0102.asp>.

6. Ibid.

7. Eisenberg, Daniel. “Stem Cell Research in Jewish Law.” Jewish Law. 2001. 16 Nov. 2004 <http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/stemcellres.html>.

8. Weckerly, Michele. “The Islamic View on Stem Cell Research.” 17 Nov. 2004  <http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/new_devs/RJLR_ND_56.pdf>.           

S T E M   C E L L   R E S E A R C H

 

Alexis Day, Christopher Gibson, Keyur Parikh

***Disclaimer***
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is Copyright ©2004/2005.