It’s Common Sense…Say YES to Education

 

More In-Depth Essays

»Where the Money Goes

»The Future

»Sources

»Course Website

»About the Authors

 

  

 “According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, students at more than 27,500 schools nationwide - almost 31 percent of all U.S. public schools - are failing at math and reading” (1).


    Is it not obvious that the United States’ current educational agenda is not holding up?  With national math and reading test results at such a low, one would think that this problem would be addressed immediately.  Obviously, education has taken a back seat.  The United States has officially placed war, the fight on terrorism, and the military in the driver’s seat, and it is looking like we are in for the long haul.  Clearly, the future security of this country is and should be held at a high priority.  However, the unfortunate aspect of this whole concept is that it can be straightforwardly observed that the future of our country is in trembling hands.  How can one expect great plans for the future if the forthcoming generation is lacking in skills as fundamental as math and reading?  This downward slide ought to come to a halt.  The United States must amplify federal funding in favor of an increase in constructive and beneficial educational resources.

    In terms of the future of educational programming, what does the United States have in mind anyway?  Well, the answer is simple; this is especially so in accordance with the fact that there is not much substance to the actual plan itself.  As of the year 2002, President George W. Bush instituted a continued enactment of The No Child Left Behind Act.  This act calls for increased flexibility, as well as ensures accountability, or responsibility, for the students‘ academic achievements.  As stated in a U.S. Department of Education overview, “The No Child Left Behind Act continues the legacy of the Brown v. Board decision by creating an education system that is more inclusive, responsive, and fair” (2). 

    Although the No Child Left Behind Act does in fact support the contention that the United States is working to improve educational resources, the entire plan itself should undoubtedly be based on more than one idea alone.  In other words, those against the increased funding of educational resources at the expense of funding of military technologies might argue that the No Child Left Behind Act has, in actuality, filtered money directly towards the increase of ‘teacher quality and performance.’  But in reality, the No Child Left Behind Act is only a small step towards what this nation needs for true academic success in children and adolescents.  Some may envision the raise in funding, through the NCLB Act, as a slow but promising adjustment.  This is true, but the No Child Left Behind Act is simply not enough!  In addition, an increased number of revisions must be made to the United States’ educational programming in order to better support the future of our nation.  An increase in federal spending would support other resources, specifically increased teacher education and preparation for the field.   

    If the problem is that money spent on military technology produces more concrete outcomes than that spent on the cultivation of teachers’ skills, then why not put the excess funding towards computer technology for students and teachers?
   

    Look at the problem of low testing scores objectively.  What the United States truly needs is a concrete plan of action.  One such action could be incorporating better technologies into schools for an increased promotion of a sturdy literacy environment.  When viewing the facts and statistics, a solution is obvious…Investments should be directed towards an increased number of computers for every school.  Surveys have shown that 81 percent of children and adolescents utilize computers at school (3).  Studies have also shown, along side these statistics, that with the greater the use of computers children and adolescents have higher results in testing scores as well.  Additional studies have shown that 78 percent of children and adolescents access the internet at home (3).  But with the low income rates of families, lower class children are less likely to own a computer within the home.  To solve this problem, higher investment in computer technologies within the school would increase the usage of resources such as the internet.  Observations like this one should have been taken and placed into effect long ago; a lot of these testing score issues would have been avoided if the United States would have simply invested a little more time and research into discovering what was causing such a downward slope in scoring.  


    To bring this argument to a close, think about the kind of people we envision our children to be.  Which of these children will be the future Presidents?  Which one of these children will discover a cure for cancers and disease?  We must focus, at this present moment, on what has to be done to ensure a prosperous future for our children and their children to come.  If we hope at all to ever come to an understanding about the state our world is in, the nation of the United States will need steady, resourceful leaders.  Reading and math skills are at the basis of what needs to be adjusted to do just that.  Some may argue that the No Child Left Behind Act should suffice for what is needed now and that the future security of our nation should override all other issues.  However, as a part of the future of the United States of America, I firmly believe that education is single path of promise.  It’s common sense…Say YES to education.



Works Cited

1. "Educators expect lawsuits targeting federal No Child Left Behind Act." 01 Nov. 2004.   WMCTV.com. WMC-TV 5 Memphis. 18 Nov. 2004   http://www.wmcstations.com/Global/story.asp?S=2509058.

2. Paige, Rod. "A Guide to Education and No Child Left Behind." ED.GOV Oct 2004. 18    Nov 2004 http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/overview/intro/guide/guide.html


3. DeBell, Matthew . "Computer and Internet Use by Children and Adolescents." 2003. Education Statistics Quarterly. National Center for Education Statistics. 18 Nov. 2004 http://search.aimhome.netscape.com/aim/boomframe.jsp?query=United+States+education&page.
fix this!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 
 

Home